Important Quotations Explained 1 I look for John Proctor that took me from my sleep and put knowledge in my heart! I never knew what pretense Salem was, I never knew the lying lessons I was taught by all these Christian women and their covenanted men!
Mar 18, Deborah Markus rated it it was ok I hate to rate this so low when it seems that the only people who do so are those forced to read it by a cruel The crucible vengeance. I'm even more troubled by the fact that I haven't seen anyone else bring up what bothers me about this play.
Yes, it's well written -- that is, the dialogue is expertly handled. There are truly beautiful passages, such as this one: I came into this village like a bridegroom to his beloved, bearing gifts of high religion; the very crowns of holy law I brought, and what I touched w I hate to rate this so low when it seems that the only people who do so are those forced to read it by a cruel teacher.
I came into this village like a bridegroom to his beloved, bearing gifts of high religion; the very crowns of holy law I brought, and what I touched with my bright confidence, it died; and where I turned the eye of my great faith, blood flowed up.
Vengeance in The Crucible by Arthur Miller FONTS Abigail Williams vs Goody Proctor cont. proctors' house Cheever: Why - He draws out a long needle from the poppet - "it is a needle! Get the Complete Destiny Collection in One Legendary Edition Destiny: The Taken King Legendary Edition is the complete collection in one epic package. Dr. Liara T'Soni is an asari researcher who has spent the past fifty years of her life studying Prothean technology and culture, specialising in the Prothean extinction. She was born on Thessia in , making her "only" —barely an adult in asari terms. She already has a great deal of insight into the Protheans and is a highly trained user of biotics.
Men have complex lives and motivations; women's lives center entirely around men, specifically around attraction to and The crucible vengeance on men.
Miller brought up the very real issues of property and land-lust that dominated the real trial. Why did he insist on sexualizing the girls involved -- to the point where he had to make one of the girls several years older than she really was?
The terrifying thing about what the real "afflicted girls" did was that it comes across as a sort of motiveless malignity. They were lashing out at their own repressive society, possibly egged on by parents who wanted to use them as weapons in battles over land.
Instead, Miller decided to say that the girls really were engaged in "witchcraft" -- or at least in stereotypical witch behavior: He insists that "there are accounts of similar klatches in Europe, where the daughters of the towns would assemble at night and, sometimes with fetishes, sometimes with a selected young man, give themselves to love, with some bastardly results.
He really seems to believe that this went on. Then there's the main character: Can't imagine why I have a hard time sympathizing with him. Imagine you know a family with three young children. They hire an au pair.
The dad has an affair with this young woman -- hardly older than a girl, a virgin, completely inexperienced in life or love.
The mom suspects that something is going on and fires her, but stays with the dad. The dad bitches at the mom for always giving him that look and not acting happy to see him all the time.
The mom breaks down crying and admits that her cold behavior must have pushed him into having an affair. The dad also bitches at the au pair, because this affair got her hopes up and she really thought it meant something to him the way it did to her.
He screams at this teenager who was lucky not to get pregnant, btw, since they didn't use birth control to get over it, already -- he's married and he's staying that way. If you heard about something like this -- maybe it happened to a friend of yours, maybe you read about it in a novel -- would your first sympathy really be with the poor, tormented man who has to put up with all these women acting like he owes them something?
Why has no one pointed out how creepy it is that John Proctor is genuinely supposed to be a sympathetic character, and Abigail is a monster? And by the way -- contrary to what Miller says in his afterword, the only "legend" that "has it that Abigail turned up later as a prostitute in Boston" is the one he started by writing this.
I'm not in 9th grade, and I still have problems with this modern classic. I understand why it is one; but I just can't give it the three "I liked it!
There is also a black slave in this play, because black people were being forced to be slaves back then. The some with women - they were treated like that back then.
You are judging it as a work of history or historical fiction.
Instead, I prefer to see this work through the lens of McCarthyism - it is a work of anti-McCarthyist propaganda, and as such it wouldn't be nearly as effective to make Abigail an innocent. We need to be able to relate to John Proctor as a flawed but redeemable human character. What makes it even more shuttering, is the fact that it has always been relevant to any era, because it represents the fear in front of something we cannot understand, and the need to create witch-hunts in order to cover up our own faults as human beings and as members of our socities.
John Proctor is the Everyman, he stands for every human being that is -rightfu A masterpiece in the history of Theatre John Proctor is the Everyman, he stands for every human being that is -rightfully- afraid in front of the face of an inhuman justice, being torchured over imaginary faults and mistakes.
What elevates him to greatness, though, is his fight with himself and the way he wins it over, desperately battling to preserve his honour, his ''name''.
I wonder, is our time so very different than those by-gone eras? Are we more understanding now, more open-minded? Do we find the respect we ask for?Jeff Monson official Sherdog mixed martial arts stats, photos, videos, breaking news, and more for the Heavyweight fighter from United States.
Vengeance in the Crucible - Vengeance is the act of taking revenge for a past wrong. In the Crucible, Thomas Putnam and Abigail Williams both took advantage of circumstances to carry out vengeance against different people. Talent Calculator for World of Warcraft: Battle for Azeroth.
In “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller, characters such as Abigail Williams, Thomas Putnam, and Ann Putnam accuse the guiltless of ‘witchcraft’ as a way to avoid the Bible’s prohibition of vengeance while still satisfying their need for revenge. Last edited by TheHate: Replaces old-style internal links with new pipe-split links.
Mon, 16 Oct EDT. The Crucible, online research about the Salem Witch Trials, and McCarthyism, the articles in this assignment sequence provide information and persuasive points of view on the topics of libel, mass hysteria, the importance of reputation, and the danger of defamation in our technologically-savvy world.